The analysis showed that the relationship within linear combinations out of the 2 groups of variables you’ll greatest getting informed me because of the you to work through good Remote-controlled worth of
Towards the PSPP, four things emerged, defined as bodily mind-worthy of, recreations proficiency, health, bodily fuel, and glamorous body having eigenvalues pÅ™ipojenÃ single muslim of 1.78, cuatro.34, step 3.59, step three.46, and you may 6.08 correspondingly bookkeeping to possess 64% of variance one of many circumstances. In contrast to the new suggested hierarchical model (Fox Corbin, 1989), not, the real thinking-value size as well as the glamorous human anatomy subscale shown big factor overlap and you may was subsequently deleted out-of next study. This basis convergence between your glamorous human body and you will real thinking-worth scales might have been said somewhere else (Sonstroem ainsi que al., 1992). The remaining about three subscales away from physical worry about-attitudes accounted for 38% of version about survey things. Cronbach (1951) alphas for these subscales was in fact .90 having football skills (six products), .86 having physical condition (six facts), and .85 for bodily fuel (six facts).
The newest POSQ together with presented a very clear grounds construction having interpretation. Two factors emerged which have eigenvalues more than step one.00 and you can have been identified as activity (6 factors) and you will pride direction (six issues) to possess take action, bookkeeping for 34% and you may 21% of your own variance in the participants’ responses, correspondingly. The latest interfactor correlation is actually negligible (roentgen = .04), in keeping with prior research (Appreciate Roberts, 1994; Roberts Value 1995) guaranteeing orthogonality of these two issues. Alpha coefficients was .71 and .90 to do the job and you will ego direction having do so subscales, correspondingly.
To check the multivariate relationships involving the linear combination of the two sets of details including bodily notice-perceptions/purpose orientations getting get it done, and you will indicator out of built-in desire having take action, canonical correlation try performed
New IMI along with showed a reliable foundation structure given that the affairs loaded on their respective affairs meeting minimal standard to be chose to possess interpretation. Eigenvalues had been greater than step one.00 to your interest/exhilaration (5 factors), recognized skills (4 circumstances), effort/strengths (5 factors), and you may pressure/stress (cuatro circumstances) built-in determination subscales, correspondingly, bookkeeping to have 60.1% of your variance in the activities. Interior reliability coefficients was in fact .82 (interest/enjoyment), .77 (seen skills), .76 (effort/ importance), and you will .77 (tension/ pressure) towards the intrinsic desire to own take action subscales.
Mode and you may fundamental deviations of one’s real worry about-impact (PSPP), task and you can ego orientations to have do so (POSQ), and you can inherent determination for do it (IMI) subscales was shown inside the Desk step 1. Tall zero purchase correlations (2-tailed) had been noticed between task positioning to have exercise and you may each other focus/excitement (r .29), and energy/benefits (r = .36). Self-attitudes off physical condition have been relevant so you can appeal/pleasure (r = .49), detected skills (roentgen .59), effort/pros (r = .49), and tension/tension (roentgen = -.27).
The newest predictor details was in fact comprising care about-attitudes away from activities competence, shape, and actual stamina, together with task and pride orientations getting do so. The new requirement parameters contains the fresh new five strategies out-of inherent motivation for get it done, particularly, interest/thrills, seen competence, effort/strengths, and you will pressure/pressure.
74, F(4, 252) = ,p <.0001). Follow-up canonical correlation analysis indicated three significant functions emerged. However, only the first function exceeded the .30 criterion (10% of the variance) suggested as the minimal level for meaningful interpretation (Tabachnick Fidell, 1989). 68 ([R.sup.2]= .46). A minimal canonical loading of .30 is considered to contribute significantly to the multivariate relationship (Pedhazur, 1982). As Table 2 demonstrates, a high positive loading on physical condition, and moderately positive loadings on task orientation for exercise, sports competence, and physical strength, were positively associated to the criterion set of variables composed of interest/ enjoyment, perceived competence, and effort/importance, and were negatively relat ed to tension/pressure for exercise. Ego orientation for exercise, however, failed to significantly contribute to the multivariate relationship. The redundancy index revealed that 16% of the variance in the four indices of intrinsic motivation for exercise could be explained by the linear combination of the predictor variables. A redundancy value of 10% is recommended as a significant and meaningful cutoff for interpretation (Pedhazur, 1982).